Network based storage of vehicle and infrastructure data for optimizing vehicle routing

ABSTRACT

A method for routing a vehicle includes determining, based on aggregated drive data from a plurality of sources, route costs for a plurality of potential driving routes for a vehicle based on reliability of an automated driving feature or driver assistance feature. The method includes selecting a route of the one or more potential driving routes based on the route costs. The method includes providing information about the route to a driver, automated driving system, or driver assistance system.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosure relates generally to methods, systems, and apparatusesfor vehicle optimization and more particularly relates to network basedstorage of vehicle and infrastructure data for optimizing vehiclerouting.

BACKGROUND

Considerable work is being performed in the automotive andtransportation industries to develop, deploy, and enable vehicles thatare able to drive themselves without human input or are able to provideassistance to a human driver. Driver assistance systems generallyinclude systems that are or will be able to provide assistance to ahuman driver including features such as avoidance of impact with otherobjects (such as pedestrians, other vehicles, or road debris), drivenotifications, or assistance in performing a turning, parking, or othermaneuver. However, Applicant has recognized that automated driving orassisted driving present considerable challenges to developing robustand safe transportation due to the large variations in drivingenvironments, including variations in driving infrastructure, roadmaterials, lane markings, the presence of other vehicles, pedestrians,or cyclists, or the like.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Non-limiting and non-exhaustive implementations of the presentdisclosure are described with reference to the following figures,wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout thevarious views unless otherwise specified. Advantages of the presentdisclosure will become better understood with regard to the followingdescription and accompanying drawings where:

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a system for optimizingrouting of a vehicle, optimizing assisted driving, or optimizingautomated driving, according to one implementation;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram illustrating an implementation of avehicle control system that includes an automated driving/assistancesystem, according to one implementation;

FIG. 3 is a schematic data flow diagram illustrating data flow andprocessing for routing a vehicle, according to one implementation;

FIG. 4 illustrate a map of roadways near a current location and targetdestination of a vehicle, according to one implementation;

FIGS. 5A and 5B are top views of example lane markings, according to oneimplementation;

FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram illustrating example components of aroute optimization component, according to one implementation; and

FIG. 7 is a schematic flow chart diagram illustrating a method fordetermining a route for a vehicle, according to one implementation.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Considerable work is being performed in the automotive andtransportation industries to develop, deploy, and enable vehicles thatare able to drive themselves without human input or are able to provideassistance to a human driver. Automated driving systems generally referto systems that are or will be able to control a vehicle to drive withlittle or no input from a human. For example, an automated drivingsystem may drive a vehicle from a current location to a destinationlocation without requiring a user to steer, control acceleration, orcontrol breaking. Driver assistance systems generally include systemsthat are or will be able to provide assistance to a human driverincluding features such as avoidance of impact with other objects (suchas pedestrians, other vehicles, or road debris), drive notifications, orassistance in performing a turning, parking, or other maneuver. However,Applicant has recognized that automated driving or assisted drivingpresent considerable challenges to developing robust and safetransportation due to the large variations in driving environments,including variations in driving infrastructure, road materials, lanemarkings, the presence of other vehicles, pedestrians, or cyclists, orthe like.

Furthermore, Applicant has recognized that some automated drivingfeatures or assisted driving features may perform more robustly in someenvironments than within other environments. For example, some automateddriving features or assisted driving features may depend oninfrastructure built into a roadway, high quality lane markings, smoothroad surfaces, or any other characteristic of a roadway or drivingenvironment to perform in a robust or safe manner. Additionally, someautomated driving features may require environments where there arerelatively few human drivers, cyclists, or pedestrians.

In recognition and in light of the foregoing, the present disclosurediscloses systems, methods, and devices that enable optimization ofvehicle driving including the optimization of vehicle routing. Accordingto one embodiment, a method for routing a vehicle includes determining,based on aggregated drive data from a plurality of sources, route costsfor a plurality of potential driving routes for a vehicle based onreliability of an automated driving feature or driver assistancefeature. The method includes selecting a route of the one or morepotential driving routes based on the route costs. The method furtherincludes providing information about the route to a driver, automateddriving system, or driver assistance system.

One example assisted driving feature provides lateral and longitudinalcontrol when certain conditions are met. These conditions may include,but are not limited to, road lane marking/line quality, lane presence(e.g., which lane the vehicle is in), and road curvature. The conditionsrequired to provide an assisted driving feature to a driver may bedynamic in that they may differ from one driving environment to another.The conditions required may depend both on the vehicle itself, includingany control system or sensors, and its surrounding environment orinfrastructure. If a driver or driving system is offered a preview ofthese vehicle and infrastructure conditions before completing a route,the driver assistance feature may be able to perform in a more robustmanner. For example, the driver or driving system may be able to selectroutes where more reliable automated driving features or driverassistance features can be provided.

According to one embodiment, drive data from a large number of vehiclesor other data sources is stored in a connected vehicle and uploaded to anetwork. For example, vehicles may acquire data about a drivingenvironment using vehicle sensors and upload that data, or any deriveddata, to a cloud storage location. Users may access the cloud storagelocation via a network using connected devices (such as a vehicle,computing system, smartphone, or the like) and download relevant data tothe vehicle. The data may be stored locally in the vehicle's mapdatabase and a routing algorithm may be run against the data in order tooptimize vehicle behavior along relevant routes.

Furthermore, with the implementation of driver assistance or automateddriving features, there may be a variety of roadways for which afeature's availability is sparse, inconsistent, or nonexistent. Forexample, some navigation algorithms choose routes based on shortestdistance, shortest time, or some other lowest heuristic cost. Applicanthas recognized that there may be considerable benefit to choosing aroute based on driver assistance availability. In one embodiment, anavigation system or navigation software provides routing that takesdriver assistance feature or automated driving feature availability intoconsideration in creating routes.

According to one example embodiment, lane line or lane marking qualitymay be of importance to an assisted driving feature or an automateddriving feature. A map database or drive history database may store somemetric of lane line quality. For example, lane line/marking quality maybe stored locally by the vehicle or may be uploaded for storage as partof aggregated data. The map database and/or drive history database maybe cloud-based, loaded onto the vehicle at manufacture, and/or createdand updated by the vehicle based on probe or sensor data. Using the mapor drive history database, a routing algorithm may be performed whichevaluates and prioritizes routes based on a lowest cost. An example costterm associated with lane line quality is:

$\begin{matrix}{{J = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\;\left( {1 - Q_{i}} \right)}},} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1}\end{matrix}$where Q∈{0,1} is a Boolean metric for lane quality (0 represents badlane quality, 1 represents good lane quality). In one embodiment, themap database or drive history database may include metrics in additionto road lane line quality such as road curvature, road lane linegeometry, road lane line/marker type (such as indication of a singleline, double line, broken line, reflector, or other lane marker type),and/or road lane line/marker color (such as white, yellow, or othercolor). In one embodiment, the routing algorithm may take theseadditional metrics or other metrics into account in prioritizing routes.For example, the routing algorithm may take into account other costssuch as shortest distance, fastest travel time, traffic conditions, orthe like to find a best all-around route based on the various costfactors. In one embodiment, the determination of line quality cost forrouting purposes may be a dynamic function that takes weather andtraffic into consideration. For example, some types of lane markers maybe more or less visible/detectable by vehicle sensors based on time ofday or weather conditions.

Referring now to the figures, FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating asystem 100 for optimizing routing of a vehicle and/or performance ofassisted driving and/or automated driving features. The system 100includes an aggregation server 102 as well as a plurality of vehicles104 and one or more other data sources 106 that are able to communicatewith the aggregation server 102 over a network 108. The aggregationserver 102 includes an aggregation component 110 and may also include aroute optimization component 112.

The aggregation component 110 may aggregate drive data or other datareceived from the vehicles 104 and the one or more other data sources106. For example, the aggregation server 102 may receive infrastructuredata, driving environment data, and/or traffic data from the vehicles104 or other data sources 106. The received data may include informationabout road bumpiness, a presence of lane markings, a lane markingquality, an indication of vehicle traffic levels, an indication ofpresence of pedestrians, a road curvature, or an accident history. Theaggregation component 110 may combine the received data to generateaggregated data within a data store 114.

The route optimization component 112 may access the aggregated data inthe data store 114 to optimize a route or provide aggregated data to oneor more of the vehicles 104. For example, the vehicle 104 may use theaggregated data to provide information about a future driving path to adriver or control system 116 to optimize driving of the vehicle 104. Thevehicle 104 may also accumulate drive data, including any informationabout a roadway or driving environment, and send the accumulated drivedata to the aggregation server 102 for storage or aggregation. The otherdata sources 106 may also upload data for aggregation to the aggregationserver 102. The other data sources 106 may include systems or sensorsfor infrastructure such as traffic cameras, vehicle or traffic sensors,weather sensors, or the like. In one embodiment, the route optimizationcomponent 112 may determine a driving route that prioritizes drivingroutes based on whether automated driving or assisted driving will beavailable to the vehicle. In one embodiment, the route optimizationcomponent 112 may be located within one or more of the vehicles 104,such as within the control system 116 of the vehicle. For example, theroute optimization component 112 may operate locally on a vehicle 104and utilize aggregated data stored in the data store 114 in combinationwith drive history data and/or map data stored locally to the vehicle104.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example vehicle control system 116 that may beused to provide automated or assisted driving to a vehicle (such as thevehicles 104 of FIG. 1), including one or more automated drivingfeatures or assisted driving features. The vehicle control system 116may include an automated driving/assistance system 202. The automateddriving/assistance system 202 may be used to automate or controloperation of a vehicle or to provide assistance to a human driver. Forexample, the automated driving/assistance system 202 may control one ormore of braking, steering, acceleration, lights, alerts, drivernotifications, radio, or any other auxiliary systems of the vehicle. Inanother example, the automated driving/assistance system 202 may not beable to provide any control of the driving (e.g., steering,acceleration, or braking), but may provide notifications and alerts toassist a human driver in driving safely. The automateddriving/assistance system 202 may include a route optimization component112 that may be used to determine routes where automated driving ordriving assistance features will operate reliably. For example, theroute optimization component 112 may cause a vehicle to be routed alongroads or roadways where high quality lane markings are available so thatthey will be easily detected by one or more sensors of the vehiclecontrol system 116, thus improving reliability of an automated drivingfeature or assisted driving feature.

The vehicle control system 116 may also include one or more sensorsystems/devices for detecting a presence of nearby objects, lanemarkers, and/or or determining a location of a parent vehicle (e.g., avehicle that includes the vehicle control system 116). For example, thevehicle control system 116 may include one or more radar systems 206,one or more LIDAR systems 208, one or more camera systems 210, a globalpositioning system (GPS) 212, and/or one or more ultra sound systems214. The vehicle control system 116 may include a data store 216 forstoring relevant or useful data for navigation and safety such as mapdata, driving history, or other data. The vehicle control system 116 mayalso include a transceiver 218 for wireless communication with a mobileor wireless network, other vehicles, infrastructure, or any othercommunication system (such as the aggregation server 102 of FIG. 1).

The vehicle control system 116 may include vehicle control actuators 220to control various aspects of the driving of the vehicle such aselectric motors, switches or other actuators, to control braking,acceleration, steering or the like. The vehicle control system 116 mayinclude one or more displays 222, speakers 224, or other devices so thatnotifications to a human driver or passenger may be provided. A display222 may include a heads-up display, dashboard display or indicator, adisplay screen, or any other visual indicator which may be seen by adriver or passenger of a vehicle. The speakers 224 may include one ormore speakers of a sound system of a vehicle or may include a speakerdedicated to driver notification.

It will be appreciated that the embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 2 are givenby way of example only. Other embodiments may include fewer oradditional components without departing from the scope of thedisclosure. Additionally, illustrated components may be combined orincluded within other components without limitation.

In one embodiment, the automated driving/assistance system 202 isconfigured to control driving or navigation of a parent vehicle. Forexample, the automated driving/assistance system 202 may control thevehicle control actuators 220 to drive a path within lanes on a road,parking lot, driveway or other location. For example, the automateddriving/assistance system 202 may determine a path based on informationor perception data provided by any of the components 206-218. The sensorsystems/devices 206-214 may be used to obtain real-time sensor data sothat the automated driving/assistance system 202 can assist a driver ordrive a vehicle in real-time.

In one embodiment, the camera systems 210 may include a plurality ofcameras. For example, the camera systems 210 may include cameras facingin different directions to provide different views and different fieldsof view for areas near or around the vehicle. Similarly, the radarsystems 206, LIDAR systems 208, and/or ultrasound systems 214 mayinclude a plurality of sensors obtaining data from different directionsaround a vehicle to provide detailed information about the surroundingsof a parent vehicle. In one embodiment, this data may be uploaded forremote storage, such as by one or more aggregation servers 102.

FIG. 3 is a data flow diagram 300 illustrating data flow and processing,according to one embodiment. Using a user interface 302, a user mayprovide a request for navigating to a destination. The user request maybe provided to a routing algorithm 304. The routing algorithm 304generates a database query to obtain data about one or more routesbetween a current location and the destination. The database query issent to a map database 306. The map database provides requested data tothe routing algorithm 304, which generates and sends an optimized routeto the user interface 302. For example, the optimized route may includean optimized route that minimizes a cost that includes one or more of adistance cost, a time cost, a cost for reliability of a driverassistance feature or automated driving feature, or the like. Forexample, the optimized route may provide a short travel time while alsorouting the vehicle/user along roadways were a driver assistance featureor automated driving feature will be reliable.

The map database 306 includes vehicle data generated by vehicle sensorsfrom one or more vehicles as well as infrastructure/environment datafrom sensors, such as infrastructure sensors or the other data sources106 of FIG. 1. The map database 306 may upload data to an aggregationnetwork 308 and/or download data from an aggregation network 308. Theaggregation network 308 may include one or more aggregation servers 102.For example, the map database 306 may be located within a vehicle andmay share collected vehicle or infrastructure data with the aggregationnetwork so that other vehicles may access and use that data. Similarly,the map database 306 may also download data from the aggregation networkto utilize data that has been aggregated based on a large number ofcontributing vehicles or data sources. For example, the map database 306may maintain a synchronized copy of aggregated data stored by theaggregation network 308 for an area near the vehicle or along a route tobe traveled by the vehicle. The aggregated data may be stored with othermap data or drive history data for usage by the routing algorithm 304.

In one embodiment, a user may access the aggregation network 308 using aconnected device 310 to view the aggregated data and/or determine whichdriving routes are available for automated driving or assisted driving.For example, the user may plan out a route in advance such that anassisted driving feature or automated driving feature is available.

FIG. 4 illustrates a map 400 of roadways near a current location 402 ofa vehicle. For example, the map 400 may illustrate roadways near thevehicle that are found in an electronic map accessible by the vehicle.The current location 402 of the vehicle may be obtained from a globalnavigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver, such as a GlobalPositioning System (GPS) receiver, Global Navigation Satellite System(GLONASS) receiver, Galilleo, or Beidou system mounted in the vehicle.

Using the current location 402, a predicted path, and/or a request froma user to navigate to a specific destination, the route optimizationcomponent 112 may determine a route to a target destination 408 based ondata about sections of road on the map 400. For example, a first roadsection 404 may be part of a first potential route and a second roadsection 406 may be part of a second potential route. The routeoptimization component 112 may determine one or more attributes of thefirst road section 404 and the second road section 406. For example, thefirst road section 404 may include low quality lane markings and mayinclude a driving environment that includes a large number ofpedestrians (e.g., the first road section 404 may run past a school).The second road section 406 may include high quality lane markings, anda low number of pedestrians or cyclists.

In one embodiment, the route optimization component 112 may calculatethe cost of a route including a cost indicating how reliable or robust adriving assistance feature or automated driving feature is likely toperform on the route. For example, the first road section 404 may have ahigher cost because a driver assistance feature may not be able tooperate robustly while the second road section 406 may have a lower orzero cost because a driver assistance feature will likely operaterobustly, or because automated driving may be available. By determininga cost for each section of roadway within a potential route between thecurrent location 402 and the target destination 408, the routeoptimization component 112 may select a lowest cost route or a routethat allows for a minimum amount of time that an automated drivingfeature or assisted driving feature is not available. For example, theroute optimization component 112 may select a route that includes thesecond road section 406 even if it is part of a longer overall route.For example, the selected route may be longer, but not so long so as tocounterbalance the reduced cost of having automated driving or driverassistance available on the route.

In one embodiment, the route optimization component 112 may obtainattributes from different road sections from a drive history, electronicmap, or any other source. For example, the route optimization component112 may obtain any of the data available from the map database 306 ofFIG. 3 or the aggregated data stored in the data store 114 of FIG. 1.Example data may include information about road bumpiness, a presence oflane markings, a lane marking quality, an indication of vehicle trafficlevels, an indication of presence of pedestrians, a road curvature, oran accident history for a section of roadway. The route optimizationcomponent 112 may also account for other factors in a route costincluding current weather, shortest travel time, shortest distance, orthe like.

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate example lane marking qualities. FIG. 5Aillustrates a top view of a high quality lane marking 502. For example,the lane marking 502 has clear boundaries, straight lines, and sharpcorners, thereby providing high quality to an automated driving systemor a driver assistance system. The lane marking 502 may also have a highlevel of contrast with a road surface, well-defined geometry, and athickness that allows it to be easily detected by an automated drivingsystem or a driver assistance system. FIG. 5B illustrates a top view ofa low quality lane marking 504. For example, the lane marking 504 mayhave lost or worn paint, may be comprised mostly of a thin width, or maybe otherwise difficult for an automated driving system or a driverassistance system to detect. Vehicles driving on a roadway where thelane markings are high quality, similar to the lane marking 502 in FIG.5A, may store an indication that the roadway has high quality lanemarkings 502 and may upload the indication of high lane marking qualityto a network location to be stored as aggregated data accessible laterand by other vehicles. Vehicles driving on a roadway where the lanemarkings are low quality, similar to the lane marking 504 in FIG. 5B,may store an indication that the roadway has low quality lane markings504 and may upload the indication of low lane marking quality to anetwork location to be stored as aggregated data accessible later and byother vehicles. As a further example, vehicles may also detect when nolane markings are present or when lane markings only include reflectivelane markings. For example, some automated driving systems or driverassistance systems may not be able to operate robustly when there are nolane markings or when only reflective lane markings are included.

The vehicles, in addition to storing an indication of lane markingquality, may also store an indication of lane marking type (painted lineand/or reflectors), lane marking color, lane marking geometry, or thelike. The vehicles may also store an indication of howvisible/detectable the lane markings are for different weather ortime-of-day conditions. For example, some lane lines may be visibleduring good weather or day-time hours but may be difficult to detectduring bad weather or night-time hours. The vehicles may also store anindication of road curvature, steepness of the roadway, road bumpiness,traffic levels for a current time of day, or any other information abouta roadway or driving environment. This information may be stored locallyand/or may be uploaded for storage at a remote location accessible via acommunications network.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating example components of a routeoptimization component 112, according to one implementation. In thedepicted embodiment, the route optimization component 112 may comprise aroute component 602, a data component 604, a categorization component606, a cost component 608, a selection component 610, and a notificationcomponent 612. The components 602-612 are given by way of illustrationonly and may not all be included in all embodiments. In fact, someembodiments may include only one or any combination of two or more ofthe components 602-612. Furthermore, some of the components 602-612 maybe located outside the route optimization component 112, such as withinan automated driving/assistance system 202 or aggregation server 102.

The route component 602 is configured to identify one or more drivingroutes between a current location of a vehicle and a destination. Forexample, the route component 602 may receive an indication of a targetdestination for the vehicle, such as a target destination indicated by auser or human driver, or as predicted by a route prediction ordestination prediction algorithm. The route component 602 may alsoreceive an indication of the current location of the vehicle asdetermined by a GPS system, such as 212 of FIG. 2, or other positioningsystem. In one embodiment, the route component 602 may identify two ormore driving routes that provide a driving distance or driving timewithin a percentage distance or time of the shortest distance route or ashortest driving time route.

The data component 604 is configured to obtain road data or drivingenvironment data for one or more sections of road between the currentlocation and the target destination. For example, the data component 604may obtain data for each section of road within the one or more drivingroutes identified by the route component 602. The data component 604 mayobtain the data from a local map database, and/or from a remote storagelocation storing aggregated data from a plurality of vehicles or datasources. In one embodiment, the data component may obtain informationabout one or more of a road bumpiness, a presence of lane markings, alane marking quality, an indication of vehicle traffic levels, anindication of presence of pedestrians, a road curvature, or an accidenthistory for each section of roadway within a potential driving route ornearby section of road. The information may also include informationabout road type (e.g., interstate, highway, city road, or the like) aswell as information about speed limit. In one embodiment, if a sectionof roadway has no corresponding data, the data component 604 may fill inattributes with default values or with the worst possible valueattributable to the road type.

In one embodiment, the data component 604 provides the data about theroad or driving environment to a control system, driver, or otherportion of a vehicle for optimizing driving. For example, the datacomponent 604 may provide aggregated data corresponding to a locationalong the route to the driver, automated driving system, or driverassistance system of the vehicle before the vehicle arrives at thelocation to prepare the vehicle for the driving conditions at thelocation or begin preparing a driving path through that location. In oneembodiment, the data component 604 provides the data to other componentsof the route optimization component 112 to determine sections of roadfor which an assisted driving feature or automated driving feature willbe available or unavailable.

In one embodiment, the data obtained by the data component 604 mayinclude information about lane markings. For example, the data component604 may obtain indications of lane marking quality for one or moresections of road within the one or more driving routes. The indicationsof lane marking quality may include one or more of an indication of lanemarking geometry, an indication of lane marking type, or an indicationof lane marking color. This information may be used by the routeoptimization component 112 to determine where specific assisted drivingfeatures or automated driving features will be available.

The categorization component 606 is configured to determine whether anautomated driving feature or assisted driving feature of the vehiclewill be able to operate robustly for a specific section of road. Forexample, the categorization component 606 may determine whetheroperation is likely to be reliable based on data obtained by the routecomponent 602 and/or the data component 604. In one embodiment, thecategorization component 606 is configured to categorize sections ofroad as reliable (reliable category) or unreliable (unreliable category)for one or more automated driving features or the driver assistancefeatures of the vehicle. In one embodiment, the categorization component606 may determine a reliability of the automated driving feature or thedriver assistance feature for a section of roadway. For example, thereliability of the features may be rated within a ranking system toprovide a numerical (such as a value from 1 to 10) or other valueindicating whether the features will be highly reliable.

The categorization component 606 may use data aggregated by anaggregation server or local data stored by the vehicle. Thecategorization component 606 may also use data about the vehicle, suchas the vehicle type, information about the sensing system of thevehicle, or information about a control system of the vehicle, todetermine a categorization. For example, some sensing systems may beable to more reliably detect environmental conditions than others.Similarly, some control systems or vehicles may be able to operate morereliably within different environmental or driving conditions. As yetanother example, the reliability may also be based on a human driver andhow they like to drive and what conditions they wish to avoid. Thus, thereliability determined by the categorization component 606 may bespecific to the vehicle and/or a driver of the vehicle.

The cost component 608 is configured to determine a route cost for eachof the routes identified by the route component 602 and/or thereliability or category determined by the categorization component 606.For example, the cost component 608 may determine a route cost for aroute based on aggregated drive data based on reliability of anautomated driving feature or driver assistance feature. The costcomponent 608 may determine the route costs based on a sensing system,control system, and/or a vehicle type of the vehicle. The cost component608 may determine the route cost based on predicted feature reliability(based on aggregated or local data) in combination with any other routecost. Examples of other route costs include current traffic conditions,current weather conditions, route total driving time, route totaldistance, or the like. In one embodiment, the cost component 608 maydetermine a feature reliability cost for each section of roadway and sumthose costs to compute an overall feature reliability cost for the wholeroute. In one embodiment, the feature reliability cost for a section ofroadway or a route may depend on current weather or current traffic.

In one embodiment, the cost component 608 may determine a route costbased on lane markings, such as their presence or absence or quality.For example, local storage or remote storage may include an indicationof lane marking quality, lane marking geometry, lane marking type, lanemarking color, and/or lane marking type (e.g., painted line orreflector). In one embodiment, the cost component 608 may determine theroute cost based on by calculating a sum of a function of lane markingquality for each section of road along the corresponding route. The costcomponent 608 may determine whether a section of roadway has a good lanemarking quality based on data obtained by the data component 604 and/ora categorization or reliability provided by the categorization component606. In one embodiment, the cost component 608 may determine whetherlane markings for a section of road along the route are detectable by anautomated driver system or driver assistance system. If the lanemarkings are not detectable, the automated driving or assisted drivingfeatures may not be available and it may be desirable to avoid thoseareas, given that other route costs are not substantially increased. Inone embodiment, the route cost component 608 determines the route costbased on indications of lane marking quality obtained from local orremote storage for sections of road within the route.

The cost component 608 may determine a total route cost for a route thatincludes a weighted sum or weighted product (using multiplied terms) ofcosts for a plurality of different cost factors. For example, the totalroute cost may be calculated by summing or multiplying a featurereliability cost, a distance cost, a travel time cost, or any other costtogether. Each cost within the total route cost may include a weightingfactor by which it is multiplied so that an appropriate weighting isapplied. For example, a driver or passenger may not wish to take a routethat has high feature reliability and a two hour longer travel time. Theweighting factors may provide balance in how the different costs affectthe total cost for a route so that an appropriate route can be selected.

The selection component 610 is configured to select a route based onroute costs determined by the cost component 608. For example, theselection component 610 may select a route from one or more potentialroutes based on the route having a lowest route cost of all thepotential routes. In one embodiment, the selection component 610 mayselect a route with a roadway that has the highest percentage of highlane marking quality. In one embodiment, the selection component 610 mayreceive an indication from a user for which route is selected. Forexample, the notification component 612 may present the one or morepotential routes and their associated route costs to a user. The usermay be able to review the potential routes and select one of them tofollow. For example, the user may decide that they want a route whereautomated driving features or assisted driving features are availablefor the whole route or for most of the route. The user may provide aselection of a route that maximizes the availability (e.g., reliability)of automated driving features or assisted driving features and theselection component 610 may select that route for traveling between acurrent location and a target destination.

The notification component 612 is configured to provide informationabout a selected route or one or more potential driving routes to ahuman user or a control system of the vehicle. For example, thenotification component 612 may provide a view of a map with a selectedroute highlighted or otherwise identified. The notification component612 may also provide highlights or other identifying information fornon-selected routes, which can then be selected and/or viewed by adriver or passenger. For example, the driver or passenger may view eachroute one-by-one to determine which route the user likes best. The usermay then select that route and begin navigation to a target destination.In one embodiment, the notification component may provide informationabout a selected route to a driver, automated driving system, or driverassistance system for following the route. For example, a navigationsystem may provide instructions to a human driver on how to follow theroute or may provide instructions to a control system or automateddriving system on how to follow the route.

The route optimization component 112 may allow for routing based onwhether automated or assisted driving features will available on aroute. As indicated by broken lines in FIGS. 1 and 2, the routeoptimization component 112 may be located locally with a vehicle orremotely from the vehicle. For example if the route optimizationcomponent 112 is located in or with the vehicle, map data or aggregateddata may be stored locally or remotely and the route optimizationcomponent 112 may obtain this data and determine a route locally. Asanother example, if the route optimization component 112 is locatedremotely from the vehicle (e.g., at an aggregation server 102), the datamay be stored locally or remotely and the route optimization component112 may obtain this data and determine a route remotely and send theroute details to the vehicle for navigation.

Referring now to FIG. 7, a schematic flow chart diagram of a method 700for routing a vehicle is illustrated. The method 700 may be performed bya route optimization component, a control system, or an aggregationserver, such as a route optimization component 112 in any of FIGS. 1, 2,or 6, a control system 116 as in any of FIGS. 1 or 2, or an aggregationserver 102 as in FIG. 1.

The method 700 begins and a cost component 608 determines at 702, basedon aggregated drive data from a plurality of sources, route costs for aplurality of potential driving routes for a vehicle based on reliabilityof an automated driving feature or driver assistance feature. Aselection component 610 selects at 704 a route of the one or morepotential driving routes based on the route costs. A notificationcomponent 612 provides information at 706 about the route to a driver,automated driving system, or driver assistance system.

EXAMPLES

The following examples pertain to further embodiments.

Example 1 is a method that includes determining, based on aggregateddrive data from a plurality of sources, route costs for a plurality ofpotential driving routes for a vehicle based on reliability of anautomated driving feature or driver assistance feature. The methodincludes selecting a route of the one or more potential driving routesbased on the route costs. The method includes providing informationabout the route to a driver, automated driving system, or driverassistance system.

In Example 2, the method of Example 1 further includes categorizing aplurality of roadway sections as in a reliable category or an unreliablecategory for the automated driving feature or the driver assistancefeature based on the aggregated drive data. Determining the route costsincludes determining based on the reliable category or unreliablecategory for the plurality of roadway sections.

In Example 3, method in any of Examples 1-2 further includes determininga reliability of the automated driving feature or the driver assistancefeature for at least a section of roadway in each of plurality of thepotential driving routes based on the aggregated drive data. Determiningthe route costs includes determining based on the reliability.

In Example 4, determining the route costs in any of Examples 1-4includes determining based on one or more of a sensing system, controlsystem, or a vehicle type of the vehicle.

In Example 5, the method in any of Examples 1-4 further includesproviding aggregated data corresponding to a location along the route tothe driver, automated driving system, or driver assistance system of thevehicle before the vehicle arrives at the location.

In Example 6, the method in any of Examples 1-5 further includeretrieving the aggregated drive data from storage remote from thevehicle.

In Example 7, determining the route costs, selecting the route, andproviding information about the route in any of Examples 1-6 includedetermining, selecting, and providing by a control system of thevehicle, wherein the method further includes providing automated drivingor driver assistance along the route.

In Example 8, determining the route costs, selecting the route, andproviding information about the route in any of Examples 1-7 includesdetermining, selecting, and providing by a system remote from thevehicle. The method further includes receiving drive data from aplurality of data sources and combining the drive data from theplurality of data sources to create the aggregated drive data.

In Example 9, the aggregated drive data in any of Examples 1-8 includesinformation about one or more of a road bumpiness, a presence of lanemarkings, a lane marking quality, an indication of vehicle trafficlevels, an indication of presence of pedestrians, a road curvature, oran accident history for a section of roadway.

Example 10 is a system that includes a cost component, a selectioncomponent, and a notification component. The cost component isconfigured to determine, based on aggregated drive data from a pluralityof sources, route costs for a plurality of potential driving routes fora vehicle based on reliability of an automated driving feature or driverassistance feature. The selection component is configured to select aroute of the one or more potential driving routes based on the routecosts. The notification component is configured to provide informationabout the route to a driver, automated driving system, or driverassistance system.

In Example 11, the system in Example 10 further includes acategorization component configured to categorize a plurality of roadwaysections as in a reliable category or an unreliable category for theautomated driving feature or the driver assistance feature based on theaggregated drive data. The cost component is configured to determine theroute costs based on the reliable category or unreliable category forthe plurality of roadway sections.

In Example 12, the system in any of Examples 10-11 further include acategorization component configured to determine a reliability of theautomated driving feature or the driver assistance feature for at leasta section of roadway in each of plurality of the potential drivingroutes based on the aggregated drive data. The cost component isconfigured to determine the route costs based on the reliability.

In Example 13, the cost component in any of Examples 10-12 is configuredto determine the route costs based on one or more of a sensing system,control system, or a vehicle type of the vehicle.

In Example 14, the system in any of Examples 10-13 further includes adata component configured to provide aggregated data corresponding to alocation along the route to the driver, automated driving system, ordriver assistance system of the vehicle before the vehicle arrives atthe location.

In Example 15, the system in any of Examples 10-14 includes a controlsystem of the vehicle, wherein the control system is configured toprovide automated driving or driver assistance along the route.

Example 16 is computer readable storage media storing instructions that,when executed by one or more processors, cause the processors todetermine, based on aggregated drive data from a plurality of sources,route costs for a plurality of potential driving routes for a vehiclebased on reliability of an automated driving feature or driverassistance feature. The instructions cause the processors to select aroute of the one or more potential driving routes based on the routecosts. The instructions cause the processors to provide informationabout the route to a driver, automated driving system, or driverassistance system.

In Example 17, the instructions in Example 16 further cause theprocessors to categorize a plurality of roadway sections as in areliable category or an unreliable category for the automated drivingfeature or the driver assistance feature based on the aggregated drivedata. Determining the route costs includes determining based on thereliable category or unreliable category for the plurality of roadwaysections.

In Example 18, the instructions in any of Examples 16-17 further causethe processors to determine a reliability of the automated drivingfeature or the driver assistance feature for at least a section ofroadway in each of plurality of the potential driving routes based onthe aggregated drive data. Determining the route costs comprisesdetermining based on the reliability.

In Example 19, the instructions in any of Examples 16-18 further causethe processors to determine the route costs by determining based on oneor more of a sensing system, control system, or a vehicle type of thevehicle.

In Example 20, the instructions in any of Examples 16-19 further causethe processors to provide aggregated data corresponding to a locationalong the route to the driver, automated driving system, or driverassistance system of the vehicle before the vehicle arrives at thelocation.

Example 21 is a system or device that includes means for implementing amethod, system, or device as in any of Examples 1-20.

In the above disclosure, reference has been made to the accompanyingdrawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way ofillustration specific implementations in which the disclosure may bepracticed. It is understood that other implementations may be utilizedand structural changes may be made without departing from the scope ofthe present disclosure. References in the specification to “oneembodiment,” “an embodiment,” “an example embodiment,” etc., indicatethat the embodiment described may include a particular feature,structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarilyinclude the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover,such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment.Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic isdescribed in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it iswithin the knowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature,structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodimentswhether or not explicitly described.

As used herein, “autonomous vehicle” may be a vehicle that acts oroperates completely independent of a human driver; or may be a vehiclethat acts or operates independent of a human driver in some instanceswhile in other instances a human driver may be able to operate thevehicle; or may be a vehicle that is predominantly operated by a humandriver, but with the assistance of an automated driving/assistancesystem.

Implementations of the systems, devices, and methods disclosed hereinmay comprise or utilize a special purpose or general-purpose computerincluding computer hardware, such as, for example, one or moreprocessors and system memory, as discussed herein. Implementationswithin the scope of the present disclosure may also include physical andother computer-readable media for carrying or storingcomputer-executable instructions and/or data structures. Suchcomputer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessedby a general purpose or special purpose computer system.Computer-readable media that store computer-executable instructions arecomputer storage media (devices). Computer-readable media that carrycomputer-executable instructions are transmission media. Thus, by way ofexample, and not limitation, implementations of the disclosure cancomprise at least two distinctly different kinds of computer-readablemedia: computer storage media (devices) and transmission media.

Computer storage media (devices) includes RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM,solid state drives (“SSDs”) (e.g., based on RAM), Flash memory,phase-change memory (“PCM”), other types of memory, other optical diskstorage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or anyother medium which can be used to store desired program code means inthe form of computer-executable instructions or data structures andwhich can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer.

An implementation of the devices, systems, and methods disclosed hereinmay communicate over a computer network. A “network” is defined as oneor more data links that enable the transport of electronic data betweencomputer systems and/or modules and/or other electronic devices. Wheninformation is transferred or provided over a network or anothercommunications connection (either hardwired, wireless, or a combinationof hardwired or wireless) to a computer, the computer properly views theconnection as a transmission medium. Transmissions media can include anetwork and/or data links, which can be used to carry desired programcode means in the form of computer-executable instructions or datastructures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or specialpurpose computer. Combinations of the above should also be includedwithin the scope of computer-readable media.

Computer-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions anddata which, when executed at a processor, cause a general purposecomputer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing deviceto perform a certain function or group of functions. The computerexecutable instructions may be, for example, binaries, intermediateformat instructions such as assembly language, or even source code.Although the subject matter has been described in language specific tostructural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understoodthat the subject matter defined in the appended claims is notnecessarily limited to the described features or acts described above.Rather, the described features and acts are disclosed as example formsof implementing the claims.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosure may bepracticed in network computing environments with many types of computersystem configurations, including, an in-dash vehicle computer, personalcomputers, desktop computers, laptop computers, message processors,hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor-based orprogrammable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframecomputers, mobile telephones, PDAs, tablets, pagers, routers, switches,various storage devices, and the like. The disclosure may also bepracticed in distributed system environments where local and remotecomputer systems, which are linked (either by hardwired data links,wireless data links, or by a combination of hardwired and wireless datalinks) through a network, both perform tasks. In a distributed systemenvironment, program modules may be located in both local and remotememory storage devices.

Further, where appropriate, functions described herein can be performedin one or more of: hardware, software, firmware, digital components, oranalog components. For example, one or more application specificintegrated circuits (ASICs) can be programmed to carry out one or moreof the systems and procedures described herein. Certain terms are usedthroughout the description and claims to refer to particular systemcomponents. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, components may bereferred to by different names. This document does not intend todistinguish between components that differ in name, but not function.

It should be noted that the sensor embodiments discussed above maycomprise computer hardware, software, firmware, or any combinationthereof to perform at least a portion of their functions. For example, asensor may include computer code configured to be executed in one ormore processors, and may include hardware logic/electrical circuitrycontrolled by the computer code. These example devices are providedherein purposes of illustration, and are not intended to be limiting.Embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented in furthertypes of devices, as would be known to persons skilled in the relevantart(s).

At least some embodiments of the disclosure have been directed tocomputer program products comprising such logic (e.g., in the form ofsoftware) stored on any computer usable medium. Such software, whenexecuted in one or more data processing devices, causes a device tooperate as described herein.

While various embodiments of the present disclosure have been describedabove, it should be understood that they have been presented by way ofexample only, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilledin the relevant art that various changes in form and detail can be madetherein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.Thus, the breadth and scope of the present disclosure should not belimited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but shouldbe defined only in accordance with the following claims and theirequivalents. The foregoing description has been presented for thepurposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to beexhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise form disclosed.Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the aboveteaching. Further, it should be noted that any or all of theaforementioned alternate implementations may be used in any combinationdesired to form additional hybrid implementations of the disclosure.

Further, although specific implementations of the disclosure have beendescribed and illustrated, the disclosure is not to be limited to thespecific forms or arrangements of parts so described and illustrated.The scope of the disclosure is to be defined by the claims appendedhereto, any future claims submitted here and in different applications,and their equivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: determining, using one ormore processors, a reliability of an automated driving feature or adriver assistance feature of a vehicle for at least a section of roadwayin each of a plurality of potential driving routes based on aggregateddrive data; determining, using the one or more processors, total routecosts for the plurality of potential driving routes based on thedetermined reliability of the automated driving feature or the driverassistance feature and one or more additional factors; selecting, usingthe one or more processors, a route of the one or more potential drivingroutes based on the total route costs; and providing, using the one ormore processors, information about the route to a driver, automateddriving system, or driver assistance system.
 2. The method of claim 1,further comprising categorizing a plurality of roadway sections as in areliable category or an unreliable category for the automated drivingfeature or the driver assistance feature based on the aggregated drivedata, wherein determining the total route costs comprises determiningbased on the reliable category or unreliable category for the pluralityof roadway sections.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining thetotal route costs comprises determining based on one or more of asensing system, control system, or a vehicle type of the vehicle.
 4. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising providing aggregated datacorresponding to a location along the route to the driver, automateddriving system, or driver assistance system of the vehicle before thevehicle arrives at the location.
 5. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising retrieving the aggregated drive data from storage remote fromthe vehicle.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the totalroute costs, selecting the route, and providing information about theroute comprises determining, selecting, and providing by a controlsystem of the vehicle, wherein the method further comprises providingautomated driving or driver assistance along the route.
 7. The method ofclaim 1, wherein determining the total route costs, selecting the route,and providing information about the route comprises determining,selecting, and providing by a system remote from the vehicle, the methodfurther comprising receiving drive data from a plurality of data sourcesand combining the drive data from the plurality of data sources tocreate the aggregated drive data.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein theaggregated drive data comprises information about one or more of a roadbumpiness, a presence of lane markings, a lane marking quality, anindication of vehicle traffic levels, an indication of presence ofpedestrians, a road curvature, or an accident history for a section ofroadway.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more additionalfactors are selected from a list comprising: travel distance, traveltime, traffic conditions, weather conditions, and road quality.
 10. Asystem comprising: one or more processors; and computer readable storagemedia storing instructions that, when executed by the one or moreprocessors, cause the one or more processors to: determine a reliabilityof an automated driving feature or a driver assistance feature for atleast a section of roadway in each of a plurality of potential drivingroutes based on aggregated drive data from a plurality of sources;determine total route costs for the plurality of potential drivingroutes based on the determined reliability of the automated drivingfeature or the driver assistance feature and one or more additionalfactors; select a route of the one or more potential driving routesbased on the total route costs; and provide information about the routeto a driver, automated driving system, or driver assistance system. 11.The system of claim 10, wherein determining the reliability comprisescategorizing a plurality of roadway sections as in a reliable categoryor an unreliable category for the automated driving feature or thedriver assistance feature based on the aggregated drive data.
 12. Thesystem of claim 10, wherein determining the total route costs comprisesdetermining based on one or more of a sensing system, control system, ora vehicle type of the vehicle.
 13. The system of claim 10, wherein theinstructions further cause the one or more processors to provideaggregated data corresponding to a location along the route to thedriver, automated driving system, or driver assistance system of thevehicle before the vehicle arrives at the location.
 14. The system ofclaim 10, wherein the system comprises a control system of the vehicle,wherein the control system is configured to provide automated driving ordriver assistance along the route.
 15. The system of claim 10, whereinthe one or more additional factors are selected from a list comprising:travel distance, travel time, traffic conditions, weather conditions,and road quality.
 16. Non-transitory computer readable storage mediastoring instructions that, when executed by one or more processors,cause the processors to: determine a reliability of an automated drivingfeature or a driver assistance feature of a vehicle for at least asection of roadway in each of a plurality of potential driving routesbased on aggregated drive data; determine total route costs for theplurality of potential driving routes based on the determinedreliability of the automated driving feature or the driver assistancefeature and one or more additional factors; select a route of the one ormore potential driving routes based on the total route costs; provideinformation about the route to a driver, automated driving system, ordriver assistance system; and provide automated driving or driverassistance during navigation of a selected route.
 17. The computerreadable storage media of claim 16, wherein the instructions furthercause the processors to categorize a plurality of roadway sections as ina reliable category or an unreliable category for the automated drivingfeature or the driver assistance feature based on the aggregated drivedata, wherein determining the total route costs comprises determiningbased on the reliable category or unreliable category for the pluralityof roadway sections.
 18. The computer readable storage media of claim16, wherein the instructions further cause the processors to determinethe total route costs by determining based on one or more of a sensingsystem, control system, or a vehicle type of the vehicle.
 19. Thecomputer readable storage media of claim 16, wherein the instructionsfurther cause the processors to provide aggregated data corresponding toa location along the route to the driver, automated driving system, ordriver assistance system of the vehicle before the vehicle arrives atthe location.
 20. The computer readable storage media of claim 16,wherein the one or more additional factors is selected from a listcomprising: travel distance, travel time, traffic conditions, weatherconditions, and road quality.